Sarah Charles
August 30, 2024
- Starbucks is struggling – with shares falling by a record 16% in May
- However, when the chain announced new CEO Brian Niccol – formerly of Chipotle – they jumped 24.5% in one day
- The change in management could be indicative of a shift from premium to “fast” coffee for the iconic chain
IN a surprising turn of events, Starbucks has taken a sharp pivot from its established brand image. The iconic coffee chain, long associated with premium quality and the craft of coffee, has replaced its CEO in a move that suggests a dramatic shift in strategy.
The new CEO, Brian Niccol, previously of Chipotle – and Pizza Hut and Taco Bell before that – brings with him a background in fast food, not premium coffee.
This change at the top signals a potential rebranding of Starbucks from a high-end coffee destination to something more akin to a “fast coffee” chain.
When the new leadership was announced, shares jumped 24.5%, or $ 21.4 billion, in one day. Predictions show Starbucks stock could more than double under its new CEO, with some media sources calling him “the messiah Starbucks has been looking for.”
The leadership shake-up comes amid a period of turbulence for Starbucks. In May of this year, its shares plunged by a historic 16%, with key market declines in the US and China. Competition from rivals offering more affordable options and a broader menu of coffee and non-coffee drinks has put pressure on Starbucks to rethink its strategy.
Recent moves, such as closing underperforming stores and experimenting with new formats like drive-thru-only locations, suggest the company is in panic mode, scrambling to find a formula that will win back customers, revive its flagging fortunes, and appease unhappy shareholders.
Adding to the tumult are waves of criticism and media scrutiny surrounding the new CEO.
Niccol, who is known for his anti-union stance and controversial management practices, has drawn ire for choosing to work remotely while pocketing a massive paycheck.
His decision to work remotely from Newport Beach, California and commute by private aeroplane to Seattle has also raised eyebrows, given the substantial financial and environmental costs involved. For a brand that once prided itself on a progressive, socially conscious image, these optics are damaging.
It suggests a shift away from the brand’s traditionally warm, community-focused ethos towards a more detached, corporate management style.
“This management shakeup at Starbucks is concerning,” says Darleen Scherer, Founder of BLACK SHEEP. “Bringing in Brian Niccol from Chipotle signals a clear shift towards prioritising profits over people.”
“While Starbucks has faced challenges, swapping CEOs like trading cards (Howard Schultz to Kevin Johnson to Howard Schultz to Laxman Narasimham) is not a sustainable strategy. We need to ask: Will this change benefit Starbucks’ workers and customers, or just boost short-term stock prices for investors?”
Why Starbucks is flailing
At the heart of the issue is a disconnect between the company’s pricing strategy and the realities of a highly competitive market.
Starbucks has built its brand on offering a premium product at a premium price, but as inflation and economic pressures mount, many consumers are finding it harder to justify paying $5 or more for a cup of coffee. Meanwhile, competitors such as Dunkin’ and McDonald’s McCafe are offering similar products at lower price points, further eroding Starbucks’ market share.
“Starbucks’ loss of market share stems from losing sight of its core values,” says Darleen. “They’ve prioritised rapid expansion and shareholder returns over investing in their workforce and maintaining quality.”
Additionally, Starbucks has been criticised for having an overly complex menu. With a dizzying array of options and constant additions of new, sometimes bizarre offerings (like the recent olive oil latte), the chain seems to have lost its identity.
It’s no longer clear whether Starbucks wants to be seen as a high-end café, a casual lunch spot, or something else entirely. This confusion has led to operational inefficiencies and diluted the brand’s once-clear market positioning.
Internally, Starbucks has struggled with high overhead costs. The company’s rapid expansion, combined with its commitment to paying above-market wages and benefits, has been good for its workers, but bad for its margins and shareholder trust.
“In China, they’ve struggled to connect with local tastes and culture. Here at home, they’ve fought against workers’ rights to unionise instead of embracing their employees as partners,” says Darleen.
“When you forget the people who built your success – both workers and loyal customers – you’re bound to stumble.”
Former CEO Howard Schultz’s ambitious growth projections proved to be unattainable, leading to disillusionment among investors. Shareholders, frustrated by the company’s lacklustre performance and declining stock price, have begun to put their foot down, demanding changes.
This shareholder pressure is likely a key factor behind the appointment of a new CEO with a proven track record of driving efficiency and cutting costs.
While the new leadership offers some hope for progress, success is not guaranteed. Starbucks faces challenges now that Chipotle did not encounter during its 2018 recovery, including boycott threats, concerns about perceived value, and issues with service speed. These elements add to the uncertainty surrounding the company’s future performance projections.
The end of “craft” coffee at Starbucks?
Starbucks built its reputation on offering a premium, “third place” experience—a space between home and work where customers could relax, enjoy high-quality coffee, and connect with their community.
Who remembers the days when you could find a state of the art La Marzocco espresso machine in a Starbucks joint?
But the hiring of a CEO with a background in fast food management suggests that Starbucks is moving away from this craft coffee identity. Instead, the focus is shifting toward convenience, optimisation, and efficiency—the hallmarks of a fast food operation.
This pivot is not without precedent. In recent years, McCafe, McDonald’s coffee offering, has been eating into Starbucks’ market share by providing a similar product at a lower price point and with greater convenience.
Starbucks’ decision to hire a leader from a fast-food background signals a recognition that the company must compete on these terms or risk further erosion of its customer base.
“I have concerns about Starbucks abandoning its premium craft image for a “fast coffee” model,” says Darleen. “
“This race to the bottom in quality and service is exactly what’s wrong with corporate coffee today. If Starbucks starts pushing assembly-line coffee and cutting corners on ingredients or worker training, they risk alienating the very customers who made them successful.”
If Starbucks continues down this path, customers might see fewer playful products and a reduction in the brand’s risk-taking. Gone could be the days of whimsical, Instagram-worthy creations like the Unicorn Frappuccino or olive oil-infused lattes.
Instead, Starbucks may focus on simplifying its menu, reducing costs, and improving speed and convenience. This shift would also likely mean fewer high-end, artisanal products and a move toward more standardised, mass-market offerings.
“We may see more drive-thrus, mobile ordering, and simplified menus – but at what cost?” says Darleen. “Will we lose the community spaces and personalised service that once defined the Starbucks experience?”
“I fear loyal customers will reject these changes, and rightfully so. Starbucks needs to remember: its strength isn’t just in selling coffee, but in creating a unique experience that values both its workers and customers.”
Whether this strategy can work remains to be seen. Starbucks became iconic for offering something different—a sense of luxury, a feeling of community, and a commitment to quality that set it apart from the fast-food giants.
A move toward becoming a “fast coffee” chain risks eroding this distinctiveness and alienating the brand’s core customers. But in a market that is increasingly price-sensitive and convenience-oriented, Starbucks may have little choice but to adapt or risk becoming irrelevant.
The question now is whether this transformation will be enough to revive Starbucks’ fortunes, or whether it marks the beginning of the end for a brand that once defined the premium coffee experience.
As the company moves away from its roots, it risks losing the very essence that made it successful in the first place. Starbucks’ future may depend on finding a balance between efficiency and the unique brand experience that customers have come to love.
Coffee Intelligence
Want to read more articles like this?Sign up for our newsletter here.
